China’s Setting the Standard for Deepfake Regulation

[…]

On January 10, according to The South China Morning Post, China’s Cyberspace Administration will implement new rules that are intended to protect people from having their voice or image digitally impersonated without their consent. The regulators refer to platforms and services using the technology to edit a person’s voice or image as, “deep synthesis providers.”

Those deep synthesis technologies could include the use of deep learning algorithms and augmented reality to generate text, audio, images or video. We’ve already seen numerous instances over the years of these technologies used to impersonate high profile individuals, ranging from celebrities and tech executives to political figures.

Under the new guidelines, companies and technologists who use the technology must first contact and receive the consent from individuals before they edit their voice or image. The rules, officially called The Administrative Provisions on Deep Synthesis for Internet Information Services come in response to governmental concerns that advances in AI tech could be used by bad actors to run scams or defame people by impersonating their identity. In presenting the guidelines, the regulators also acknowledge areas where these technologies could prove useful. Rather than impose a wholesale ban, the regulator says it would actually promote the tech’s legal use and, “provide powerful legal protection to ensure and facilitate,” its development.

But, like many of China’s proposed tech policies, political considerations are inseparable. According to the South China Morning Post, news stories reposted using the technology must come from a government approved list of news outlets. Similarly, the rules require all so-called deep synthesis providers adhere to local laws and maintain “correct political direction and correct public opinion orientation.” Correct here, of course, is determined unilaterally by the state.

Though certain U.S states like New Jersey and Illinois have introduced local privacy legislation that addresses deepfakes, the lack of any meaningful federal privacy laws limits regulators’ abilities to address the tech on a national level. In the private sector, major U.S. platforms like Facebook and Twitter have created new systems meant to detect and flag deepfakes, though they are constantly trying to stay one step ahead of bad actors continually looking for ways to evade those filters.

If China’s new rules are successful, it could lay down a policy framework other nations could build upon and adapt. It wouldn’t be the first time China’s led the pack on strict tech reform. Last year, China introduced sweeping new data privacy laws that radically limited the ways private companies could collect an individual’s personal identity. Those rules were built off of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation

[…]

That all sounds great, but China’s privacy laws have one glaring loophole tucked within it. Though the law protects people from private companies feeding off their data, it does almost nothing to prevent those same harms being carried out by the government. Similarly, with deepfakes, it’s unclear how the newly proposed regulations would, for instance, prohibit a state-run agency from doctoring or manipulating certain text or audio to influence the narrative around controversial or sensitive political events.

Source: China’s Setting the Standard for Deepfake Regulation

China is also the one setting the bar for anti-monopolistic practices, the EU and US have been caught with their fingers in the jam jar and their pants down.

Transparent sunlight-activated antifogging metamaterials

[…] Here, guided by nucleation thermodynamics, we design a transparent, sunlight-activated, photothermal coating to inhibit fogging. The metamaterial coating contains a nanoscopically thin percolating gold layer and is most absorptive in the near-infrared range, where half of the sunlight energy resides, thus maintaining visible transparency. The photoinduced heating effect enables sustained and superior fog prevention (4-fold improvement) and removal (3-fold improvement) compared with uncoated samples, and overall impressive performance, indoors and outdoors, even under cloudy conditions. The extreme thinness (~10 nm) of the coating—which can be produced by standard, readily scalable fabrication processes—enables integration beneath other coatings […]

Source: Transparent sunlight-activated antifogging metamaterials | Nature Nanotechnology

Skyglow pollution is separating us from the stars but also killing earth knowledge and species

[…]

It’s not only star gazing that’s in jeopardy. Culture, wildlife and other scientific advancements are being threatened by mass light infrastructure that is costing cities billions of dollars a year as it expands alongside exponential population growth.

Some researchers call light pollution cultural genocide. Generations of complex knowledge systems, built by Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders upon a once-clear view of the Milky Way, are being lost.

In the natural world, the mountain pygmy possum, a marsupial native to Australia, is critically endangered. Its main food source, the bogong moth, is being affected by artificial outdoor lighting messing with its migration patterns. Sea turtles are exhibiting erratic nesting and migration behaviours due to lights blasting from new coastal developments.

So how bright does our future look under a blanket of light?

“If you go to Mount Coot-tha, basically the highest point in Brisbane, every streetlight you can see from up there is a waste of energy,” Downs says. “Why is light going up and being wasted into the atmosphere? There’s no need for it.”

Skyglow

Around the world, one in three people can’t see the Milky Way at night because their skies are excessively illuminated. Four in five people live in towns and cities that emit enough light to limit their view of the stars. In Europe, that figure soars to 99%.

Blame skyglow – the unnecessary illumination of the sky above, and surrounding, an urban area. It’s easy to see it if you travel an hour from a city, turn around, then look back towards its centre.

[…]

Artificial lights at night cause skyglow in two ways: spill and glare. Light spills from a bulb when it trespasses beyond the area intended to be lit, while glare is a visual sensation caused by excessive brightness.

Streetlights contribute hugely to this skyglow and have been causing astronomers anxiety for decades.

[…]

Source: Blinded by the light: how skyglow pollution is separating us from the stars | Queensland | The Guardian