AI Tool Decodes Brain Cancer’s Genome During Surgery

Scientists have designed an AI tool that can rapidly decode a brain tumor’s DNA to determine its molecular identity during surgery — critical information that under the current approach can take a few days and up to a few weeks.

Knowing a tumor’s molecular type enables neurosurgeons to make decisions such as how much brain tissue to remove and whether to place tumor-killing drugs directly into the brain — while the patient is still on the operating table.

[…]

A report on the work, led by Harvard Medical School researchers, is published July 7 in the journal Med.

Accurate molecular diagnosis — which details DNA alterations in a cell — during surgery can help a neurosurgeon decide how much brain tissue to remove. Removing too much when the tumor is less aggressive can affect a patient’s neurologic and cognitive function. Likewise, removing too little when the tumor is highly aggressive may leave behind malignant tissue that can grow and spread quickly.

[…]

Knowing a tumor’s molecular identity during surgery is also valuable because certain tumors benefit from on-the-spot treatment with drug-coated wafers placed directly into the brain at the time of the operation, Yu said.

[…]

The tool, called CHARM (Cryosection Histopathology Assessment and Review Machine), is freely available to other researchers. It still has to be clinically validated through testing in real-world settings and cleared by the FDA before deployment in hospitals, the research team said.

[…]

CHARM was developed using 2,334 brain tumor samples from 1,524 people with glioma from three different patient populations. When tested on a never-before-seen set of brain samples, the tool distinguished tumors with specific molecular mutations at 93 percent accuracy and successfully classified three major types of gliomas with distinct molecular features that carry different prognoses and respond differently to treatments.

Going a step further, the tool successfully captured visual characteristics of the tissue surrounding the malignant cells. It was capable of spotting telltale areas with greater cellular density and more cell death within samples, both of which signal more aggressive glioma types.

The tool was also able to pinpoint clinically important molecular alterations in a subset of low-grade gliomas, a subtype of glioma that is less aggressive and therefore less likely to invade surrounding tissue. Each of these changes also signals different propensity for growth, spread, and treatment response.

The tool further connected the appearance of the cells — the shape of their nuclei, the presence of edema around the cells — with the molecular profile of the tumor. This means that the algorithm can pinpoint how a cell’s appearance relates to the molecular type of a tumor.

[…]

Source: AI Tool Decodes Brain Cancer’s Genome During Surgery | Harvard Medical School

Sacramento Sheriff is sharing license plate reader data with anti-abortion states, records show

In 2015, Democratic Elk Grove Assemblyman Jim Cooper voted for Senate Bill 34, which restricted law enforcement from sharing automated license plate reader (ALPR) data with out-of-state authorities. In 2023, now-Sacramento County Sheriff Cooper appears to be doing just that.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) a digital rights group, has sent Cooper a letter requesting that the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office cease sharing ALPR data with out-of-state agencies that could use it to prosecute someone for seeking an abortion.

According to documents that the Sheriff’s Office provided EFF through a public records request, it has shared license plate reader data with law enforcement agencies in states that have passed laws banning abortion, including Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas.

[…]

Schwartz said that a sheriff in Texas, Idaho or any other state with an abortion ban on the books could use that data to track people’s movements around California, knowing where they live, where they work and where they seek reproductive medical care, including abortions.

The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office isn’t the only one sharing that data; in May, EFF released a report showing that 71 law enforcement agencies in 22 California counties — including Sacramento County — were sharing such data. The practice is in violation of a 2015 law that states “a (California law enforcement) agency shall not sell, share, or transfer ALPR information, except to another (California law enforcement) agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law.”

[…]

 

Source: Sacramento Sheriff is sharing license plate reader data with anti-abortion states, records show

Comedian, novelists sue OpenAI for reading books. Maybe we should sue people for reading them as well?

Award-winning novelists Paul Tremblay and Mona Awad, and, separately comedian Sarah Silverman and novelists Christopher Golden and Richard Kadrey, have sued OpenAI and accused the startup of training ChatGPT on their books without consent, violating copyright laws.

The lawsuits, both filed in the Northern District Court of San Francisco, say ChatGPT generates accurate summaries of their books and highlighted this as evidence for the software being trained on their work.

[…]

In the second suit, Silverman et al [PDF], make similar claims.

[…]

OpenAI trains its large language models by scraping text from the internet, and although it hasn’t revealed exactly what resources it has swallowed up, the startup has admitted to training its systems on hundreds of thousands of books protected by copyright, and stored on websites like Sci-Hub or Bibliotik.

[…]

Source: Comedian, novelists sue OpenAI for scraping books • The Register

The problem is though, that people read books too. And they can (and do) create accurate summaries from them. What is worse, is that the creativity shown by people can be shown to be influenced by the books, art, dance, etc that they have ingested. So maybe people should be banned from reading books as well under copyright?

GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers, can be fooled very easily

GPT detectors frequently misclassify non-native English writing as AI generated, raising concerns about fairness and robustness. Addressing the biases in these detectors is crucial to prevent the marginalization of non-native English speakers in evaluative and educational settings and to create a more equitable digital landscape.

[…]

if AI-generated content can easily evade detection while human text is frequently misclassified, how effective are these detectors truly?
Our findings emphasize the need for increased focus on the fairness and robustness of GPT detectors, as overlooking their biases may lead to unintended consequences, such as the marginalization of non-native speakers in evaluative or educational settings
[…]
GPT detectors exhibit significant bias against non-native English authors, as demonstrated by their high misclassification of TOEFL essays written by non-native speakers […] While the detectors accurately classified the US student essays, they incorrectly labeled more than half of the TOEFL essays as “AI-generated” (average false-positive rate: 61.3%). All detectors unanimously identified 19.8% of the human-written TOEFL essays as AI authored, and at least one detector flagged 97.8% of TOEFL essays as AI generated.
[…]
On the other hand, we found that current GPT detectors are not as adept at catching AI plagiarism as one might assume. As a proof-of-concept, we asked ChatGPT to generate responses for the 2022–2023 US Common App college admission essay prompts. Initially, detectors were effective in spotting these AI-generated essays. However, upon prompting ChatGPT to self-edit its text with more literary language (prompt: “Elevate the provided text by employing literary language”), detection rates plummeted to near zero
[…]

Source: GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers: Patterns

Phone cam array – An open-source, modular photogrammetry system made of Android phones

Photogrammetry is a 3D reconstruction technique using photographs of the target from multiple angles. Taking pictures around a static object with a single camera can yield high-quality models, but if the subject moves between images, 3D reconstruction might fail. One way to mitigate this is to use multiple cameras.
This project aimed to develop a tool for fast and precise wound documentation for clinical forensic medicine.
This paper describes a simple, low-cost modular system, where smartphones of different manufacturers are used as networked cameras. Exposure is initiated at the same time in all the phones with a simple circuit emulating a headset button press.
A proof-of-concept device was built, where four phones (Huawei nova 8i (2 pcs), Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Oukitel K4000 Pro) were attached to a curved, 3D-printed, handheld frame.
The average delay of image capture was 636 ms between the quickest and the slowest phones. When compared to the single-camera approach, the use of different cameras did not reduce the quality of the 3D model. The phone cam array was less susceptible to movement artefacts caused by breathing. Wound assessment was possible based on the 3D models created with this device.
[…]
Source file repository https://doi.org/10.17632/2nhfs99zcy.1

[…]

In this paper, a simple, but modular 3D-printed frame is described. The phones are attached to a handheld, curved frame, which ensures that all the cameras would focus on the same point. The pieces are joined by heat-set inserts and metric screws. The 3D-printed phone mounts are attached with cable ties.

  • A simple modular system of Android phones to capture images concurrently for photogrammetry reconstruction.
  • The phones do not need to be the same model or make.
  • The phones are attached to a 3D-printed handheld frame.
  • The system allows the 3D reconstruction of living, moving subjects.

[…]

The core of the system is a simple controller module, which connects to the phone with a 3.5 mm jack plug and emulates the press of volume + of a headset, to release the camera shutter. The design is based on the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) accessory specification

[…]

Source: Phone cam array – An open-source, modular photogrammetry system made of Android phones – HardwareX

Project comes with STL and STEP files as well as materials list

Elizabeth Holmes’ Prison Sentence Quietly Reduced by Two Years, as is Theranos CEO’s

Disgraced Theranos co-founder Elizabeth Holmes’ prison sentence has been reduced by two years, according to the Bureau of Prisons records. Holmes was sentenced to 11 years and three months in prison for defrauding investors by claiming her blood-testing company provided quick and reliable results but she was found to have lied about the reliability of those tests.

Holmes surrendered to the Bureau of Prisons in California on May 30 to serve out her sentence at a minimum-security all-female federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas. Less than two months after she reported to prison, her sentence was quietly changed, with her new release date scheduled for December 29, 2032, the Bureau’s site says. The Bureau has not provided additional information for why Holmes’ projected release date was shortened, but its site says an inmate’s good behavior, substance abuse program completion, and time credits they receive for activities and programs they’ve completed can result in a lessened sentence.

Only last month, Theranos’ former president and chief operating officer Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani’s 13-year sentence was likewise reduced by two years, making his new projected release date April 11, 2034.

[…]

Holmes’s reduced sentence appears to be the latest in a string of leniencies granted to her by the court system including being allowed to remain at her California estate while she appealed her prison sentence, rather than waiting behind bars.

Theranos collapsed in 2018 after an explosive investigative piece by the Wall Street Journal revealed that Holmes had made false claims that the blood-testing technology was accurate.

[…]

Source: Elizabeth Holmes’ Prison Sentence Quietly Reduced by Two Years

That this scumbag can be released at all is incredible.

Amazon claims it isn’t a “Very Large Online Platform” to evade EU rules

Amazon doesn’t want to comply with Europe’s Digital Services Act, and to avoid the rules the company is arguing that it doesn’t meet the definition of a Very Large Online Platform under EU law. Amazon filed an appeal at the EU General Court to challenge the European Commission decision that Amazon meets the criteria and must comply with the new regulations.

“We agree with the EC’s objective and are committed to protecting customers from illegal products and content, but Amazon doesn’t fit this description of a ‘Very Large Online Platform’ (VLOP) under the DSA and therefore should not be designated as such,” Amazon said in a statement provided to Ars today.

[…]

Amazon argued that the new law is supposed to “address systemic risks posed by very large companies with advertising as their primary revenue and that distribute speech and information,” and not businesses that are primarily retail-based. “The vast majority of our revenue comes from our retail business,” Amazon said.

Amazon claims to be “unfairly singled out”

Amazon also claims it’s unfair that some retailers with larger businesses in individual countries weren’t on the list of 19 companies that must comply with the Digital Services Act. The rules only designate platforms with over 45 million active users in the EU as of February 17.

Amazon said it is “not the largest retailer in any of the EU countries where we operate, and none of these largest retailers in each European country has been designated as a VLOP. If the VLOP designation were to be applied to Amazon and not to other large retailers across the EU, Amazon would be unfairly singled out and forced to meet onerous administrative obligations that don’t benefit EU consumers.”

Those other companies Amazon referred to include Poland’s Allegro or the Dutch Bol.com, according to a Bloomberg report. Neither of those platforms appears to have at least 45 million active users.

[…]

In April, Europe announced its designation of 19 large online platforms, which are mostly US-based companies. Five are run by Google, specifically YouTube, Google Search, the Google Play app and digital media store, Google Maps, and Google Shopping. Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram are on the list, as are Amazon’s online store, Apple’s App Store, Microsoft’s Bing search engine, TikTok, Twitter, and Wikipedia.

Listed platforms also include Alibaba AliExpress, Booking.com, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Snapchat. The other platform is German online retailer Zalando, which was the first company to sue the EC in an attempt to get removed from the list.

Companies have until August 25 to comply and could face fines of up to 6 percent of their annual revenue if they don’t. Companies will have to submit annual risk assessments and risk mitigation plans that are subject to independent audits and oversight by the European Commission.

“Platforms will have to identify, analyze and mitigate a wide array of systemic risks ranging from how illegal content and disinformation can be amplified on their services, to the impact on the freedom of expression and media freedom,” the EC said in April. “Similarly, specific risks around gender-based violence online and the protection of minors online and their mental health must be assessed and mitigated.” One new rule bans advertisements that target users based on sensitive data such as ethnic origin, political opinions, or sexual orientation.

The EC also said that users must be given “clear information on why they are recommended certain information and will have the right to opt-out from recommendation systems based on profiling.” Users must have the ability “to report illegal content easily and platforms have to process such reports diligently.” Amazon and the other platforms must also “provide an easily understandable, plain-language summary of their terms and conditions, in the languages of the Member States where they operate.”

[…]

 

Source: Amazon claims it isn’t a “Very Large Online Platform” to evade EU rules | Ars Technica

Poor poor Amazon – the spy company monopolist marketplace that rips off the retailers in it’s own market!

Mom pleads guilty to abortion after Meta gives DMs to cops – 2023 and these are the witch hunts we see in the land of the free, USA

A Nebraska mother pleaded guilty on Friday to giving her 17-year-old daughter pills for an abortion last year and to helping her dispose of the 29-week-old fetus.

Jessica Burgess, 42, in a plea agreement admitted providing an abortion to her daughter Celeste after 20 weeks of pregnancy, false reporting, and tampering with human remains, according to the Associated Press. Two of the charges are felonies, one is a misdemeanor.

Burgess last August pleaded not guilty to five criminal charges. As part of the plea agreement, the State of Nebraska dropped two of them: concealing the death of a person, and abortion by a person who is not a licensed physician. She is scheduled to be sentenced in September.

The Burgess case began in April 2022 when a Norfolk Police detective began investigating “concerns” – a tip – that the daughter had a stillbirth and had enlisted the help of her mother to dispose of the fetus.

Norfolk Police detective Ben McBride in an affidavit [PDF] describes obtaining the medical records of the women, interviewing them, and obtaining a search warrant to gain access to the women’s Meta/Facebook account data, based on knowledge of a relevant Facebook Messenger discussion.

The messages obtained discuss taking the pills and plans to burn the fetus.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Last August, after the charges were first filed, Meta issued a statement saying that it had responded to valid legal warrants related to the “alleged illegal burning and burial of a stillborn infant.”

“The warrants did not mention abortion at all,” the company said.

[…]

Source: Mom pleads guilty to abortion after Meta gives DMs to cops • The Register

An Alarming 87 Percent Of Retro Games Are Being Lost To Time

[…] The Video Game History Foundation (VGHF) partnered with the Software Preservation Network, an organization intent on advancing software preservation through collective action, to release a report on the disappearance of classic video games. “Classic” in this case has been defined as all games released before 2010, which the VGHF noted is the “year when digital game distribution started to take off.”

The status of physical video games

In the study, the two groups found that 87 percent of these classic games are not in release and considered critically endangered due to their widespread unavailability.

[…]

“For accessing nearly 9 in 10 classic games, there are few options: Seek out and maintain vintage collectible games and hardware, travel across the country to visit a library, or… piracy,” VGHF co-director Kelsey Lewin wrote.

[…]

the study claims that just 13 percent of game history is archived in libraries right now. And that’s part of the dilemma here. According to a March 2023 Ars Technica report, laws around the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) largely prevent folks from making and distributing copies of any DRM-protected digital work. While the U.S. Copyright Office has issued exemptions to those rules so that libraries and researchers can archive digital material, video games are explicitly left out, which makes it nigh impossible for anyone to effectively study game history.

“Imagine if the only way to watch Titanic was to find a used VHS tape, and maintain your own vintage equipment so that you could still watch it,” Lewin wrote. “And what if no library, not even the Library of Congress, could do any better—they could keep and digitize that VHS of Titanic, but you’d have to go all the way there to watch it.

[…]

Though not surprised, she was still alarmed by the “flimsy” ways in which games disappear, pointing to Antstream Arcade, which houses a plethora of games from the Commodore 64 to the Game Boy that could be lost to time should it close up shop. The Nintendo eShop is a more mainstream example.

“When the eShop shut down the availability of the Game Boy library, [the number of available Game Boy games] went from something like 11 percent to 4.5 percent,” Lewin said. “The company wiped out half of the availability of the library of Game Boy games just by shutting down the Nintendo eShop.

[…]

Lewin noted that although libraries are allowed to do a lot of things “by being libraries [and] preservation institutions,” the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has consistently lobbied against game preservation efforts such as copyright permissions and allowing the rental of digital video games.

“The ESA has basically opposed all of these new proposed exemptions,” Lewin said. “They’ve just been like, ‘No, that will hurt our bottom line,’ or, ‘That will hurt the industry’s bottom line.’ The ESA also says the industry is doing plenty to keep classic games in release, pointing to this thriving reissue market. And that’s true; there is a thriving reissue market. It’s just that it only covers 13 percent of video games, and that’s not likely to get any better any time soon.”

Read More: As More Games Disappear Forever, John Carmack Has Some Great Advice About Preservation

The study will be used in a 2024 copyright hearing to ask for exemptions for games. Lewin said she’s hopeful that progress will be made, suggesting that, should the hearing go well, games could be available on digital library apps like Libby. You can read the full 50-page study on the open repository Zenodo.

Source: An Alarming 87 Percent Of Retro Games Are Being Lost To Time

France Allows Police to Remotely Turn On GPS, Camera, Audio on Phones

Amidst ongoing protests in France, the country has just passed a new bill that will allow police to remotely access suspects’ cameras, microphones, and GPS on cell phones and other devices.

As reported by Le Monde, the bill has been criticized by the French people as a “snoopers” charter that allows police unfettered access to the location of its citizens. Moreover, police can activate cameras and microphones to take video and audio recordings of suspects. The bill will reportedly only apply to suspects in crimes that are punishable by a minimum of five years in jail

[…]

French politicians added an amendment that orders judge approval for any surveillance conducted under the scope of the bill and limits the duration of surveillance to six months

[…]

In 2021, The New York Times reported that the French Parliament passed a bill that would expand the French police force’s ability to monitor civilians using drones. French President Emmanuel Macron argued at the time that the bill was meant to protect police officers from increasingly violent protestors.

[…]

 

Source: France Passes Bill Allowing Police to Remotely Access Phones

Amazon’s iRobot Roomba acquisition under formal EU investigation

European Union regulators have opened an official investigation into Amazon’s proposed $1.7 billion acquisition of iRobot, the company behind the popular Roomba lineup of robot vacuum cleaners.

In a press release, the European Commission said it’s concerned that “the transaction would allow Amazon to restrict competition in the market for robot vacuum cleaners (‘RVCs’) and to strengthen its position as online marketplace provider.” The European Commission is also looking at how getting access to iRobot users’ data may give Amazon an advantage “in the market for online marketplace services to third-party sellers (and related advertising services) and / or other data-related markets.”

[…]

Source: Amazon’s iRobot Roomba acquisition under formal EU investigation

Do you really want Amazon to know the layout of the interior of your home?