Tesla Systematically Lied To Customers, Blaming Them For Shoddy Parts The Company Knew Were Defective, has highest accident rate of any brand on the road

Back in July, Reuters released a bombshell report showing that not only has Tesla aggressively lied about its EV ranges for the better part of the last decade, it created teams whose entire purpose was to lie to customers about it when they called up to complain. The story lasted all of two days in the news cycle before it was supplanted by clickbait stories about a billionaire fist fight that never actually happened.

Now Reuters is back again, with another major story showcasing how for much of that same decade, Tesla routinely blamed customers for the failure of substandard parts the company knew to be defective. The outlet reviewed thousands of Tesla documents and found a pattern where customers would complain about dangerously broken and low-quality parts, only to be repeatedly gaslit by the company:

“Wheels falling off cars at speed. Suspensions collapsing on brand-new vehicles. Axles breaking under acceleration. Tens of thousands of customers told Tesla about a host of part failures on low-mileage cars. The automaker sought to blame drivers for vehicle ‘abuse,’ but Tesla documents show it had tracked the chronic ‘flaws’ and ‘failures’ for years.”

The records show a repeated pattern across tens of thousands of customers where parts would fail, then the customer would be accused of “abusing” their vehicle. They also show that Tesla meticulously tracked part failures, knew many parts were defective, and routinely not only lied to regulators about it, but charged customers to repair parts they knew had high failure rates and were systemically prone to failure:

“Yet the company has denied some of the suspension and steering problems in statements to U.S. regulators and the public– and, according to Tesla records, sought to shift some of the resulting repair costs to customers.”

This is obviously a very different narrative than the one Musk presented last month at that unhinged New York Times DealBook event:

“We make the best cars. Whether you hate me, like me or are indifferent, do you want the best car, or do you not want the best car?”

They are, as it turns out, not the best cars.

And this is before you even touch on the growing pile of corpses caused by the company’s half-cooked and repeatedly misrepresented “full self driving” technology, which last week resulted in the recall of nearly every vehicle that has it. That problem was, as reports have documented in detail, thanks in part to non-engineer Musk over-ruling his actual engineers when it comes to only using cameras.

This comes as a new study shows that Tesla vehicles have the highest accident rate of any brand on the road. As usual, U.S. regulators have generally been asleep or lethargic during most of this, worried that enforcing basic public safety standards would somehow be stifling “innovation.”

The deaths from “full self driving” have been going on for the better part of the last decade, yet the NHTSA only just apparently figured out where its pants were located. But a lot of the problems Reuters have revealed should be slam dunk cases for the FTC under the “unfair and deceptive” component of the FTC Act, creating what will likely be a very busy 2024 for Elon Musk.

A lot of this stuff has been discussed by Tesla critics for years. It’s only once Musk began his downward descent into full racist caricature and undeniable self-immolation that press outlets with actual resources started to meaningfully dig beyond the hype. There’s cause for some significant U.S. journalism introspection as to why that is that probably will never happen.

Meanwhile, for a supposed innovation super-genius, most Musk companies have the kind of customer service that makes Comcast seem empathic and competent.

There’s no shortage of nightmare stories about Tesla Solar customer service. And we’ve well documented how Starlink can’t even respond to basic email inquiries by users tired of being on year-long waiting lists and seeking refunds. And once you burn past the novelty, gimmicks, and fanboy denialism, Tesla automotive clearly isn’t any better.

That said, this goes well beyond just bad customer service. The original Reuters story from July about the company lying about EV ranges clearly demonstrates not just bad customer service, but profound corporate culture rot:

“Inside the Nevada team’s office, some employees celebrated canceling service appointments by putting their phones on mute and striking a metal xylophone, triggering applause from coworkers who sometimes stood on desks. The team often closed hundreds of cases a week and staffers were tracked on their average number of diverted appointments per day.”

As with much of what Musk does, a large share of what the press initially sold the public as unbridled innovation was really just cutting corners. It’s easy to accomplish more than the next guy when you refuse to invest in customer service, don’t care about labor or environmental laws, don’t care about public safety, don’t care about the customer, and have zero compulsion about lying to regulators or making things up at every conceivable opportunity.

Source: Tesla Lied To Customers, Blaming Them For Shoddy Parts The Company Knew Were Defective | Techdirt

Slovakian PM wants to kill EU anti-corruption policing

Prime Minister Robert Fico’s push dissolve the body that now oversees high-profile corruption cases poses a risk to the EU’s financial interests and would harm the work of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, Juraj Novocký, Slovakia’s representative to the EU body, told Euractiv Slovakia.

Fico’s government wants to pass a reform that would eliminate the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, reduce penalties, including those for corruption, and curtail the rights of whistleblowers.

Novocký points out that the reform would also bring a radical shortening of limitation periods: “Through a thorough analysis, we have found that if the amendment is adopted as proposed, we will have to stop prosecution in at least twenty cases for this reason,” Novocký of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) told Euractiv Slovakia.

“This has a concrete effect on the EPPO’s activities and indirectly on the protection of the financial interests of the EU because, in such cases, there will be no compensation for the damage caused,” Novocký added.

On Monday, EU Chief Prosecutor Laura Kövesi addressed the government’s push for reform in a letter to the European Commission, concluding that it constitutes a serious risk of breaching the rule of law in the meaning of Article 4(2)(c) of the Conditionality Regulation.

[…]

Source: Fico’s corruption reforms may block investigations in 20 EU fraud cases – EURACTIV.com

AI cannot be patent ‘inventor’, UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case – but a company can

A U.S. computer scientist on Wednesday lost his bid to register patents over inventions created by his artificial intelligence system in a landmark case in Britain about whether AI can own patent rights.

Stephen Thaler wanted to be granted two patents in the UK for inventions he says were devised by his “creativity machine” called DABUS.

His attempt to register the patents was refused by the UK’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) on the grounds that the inventor must be a human or a company, rather than a machine.

Thaler appealed to the UK’s Supreme Court, which on Wednesday unanimously rejected his appeal as under UK patent law “an inventor must be a natural person”.

Judge David Kitchin said in the court’s written ruling that the case was “not concerned with the broader question whether technical advances generated by machines acting autonomously and powered by AI should be patentable”.

Thaler’s lawyers said in a statement that the ruling “establishes that UK patent law is currently wholly unsuitable for protecting inventions generated autonomously by AI machines and as a consequence wholly inadequate in supporting any industry that relies on AI in the development of new technologies”.

‘LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS’

A spokesperson for the IPO welcomed the decision “and the clarification it gives as to the law as it stands in relation to the patenting of creations of artificial intelligence machines”.

They added that there are “legitimate questions as to how the patent system and indeed intellectual property more broadly should handle such creations” and the government will keep this area of law under review.

[…]

“The judgment does not preclude a person using an AI to devise an invention – in such a scenario, it would be possible to apply for a patent provided that person is identified as the inventor.”

In a separate case last month, London’s High Court ruled that artificial neural networks can attract patent protection under UK law.

Source: AI cannot be patent ‘inventor’, UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case | Reuters

Somehow it sits strangely that a company can be a ‘natural person’ but an AI cannot.

Apple Pay, Apple Card and Wallet were down for some users this morning – again

Apple’s financial services, including Apple Pay, Apple Cash, Apple Card and Wallet, experienced service disruptions for some users between 6:15 AM and 6:49 AM Eastern this morning, according to the company’s System Status page. As AppleInsider notes, it’s unclear how widespread the issues were, but the company has experienced intermittent Apple Pay issues earlier this year.

[…]

Source: Apple Pay, Apple Card and Wallet were down for some users this morning

Microsoft is killing Windows mixed reality platform

Windows Mixed Reality is heading to a farm upstate. Microsoft is shutting down the platform, according to an official list of deprecated Windows features. This includes the garden variety Windows Mixed Reality software, along with the Mixed Reality Portal app and the affiliated Steam VR app. The platform isn’t gone yet, but Microsoft says it’ll be “removed in a future release of Windows.”

Microsoft first unveiled Windows Mixed Reality back in 2017 as its attempt to compete with rivals in the VR space, like HTC and Oculus (which is now owned by Meta.) We were fascinated by the tech when it first launched, as it offered the ability for in-person shared mixed reality.

[…]

Microsoft’s platform was ultimately adopted by several VR headsets, like the HP Reverb G2 and others manufactured by companies like Acer, Asus and Samsung. The Windows Mixed Reality Portal app allowed access to games, experiences and plenty of work-related productivity apps. However, it looks like the adoption rate wasn’t up to snuff, as indicated by today’s news.

Despite the imminent end to the platform, it doesn’t look to be impacting Microsoft’s other mixed-reality ecosystem, the HoloLens 2. Microsoft added a Windows 11 upgrade and other improvements for the business-focused headset earlier this year, according to The Verge.

[…]

Microsoft has made sweeping cuts throughout its VR division, leading to layoffs and the discontinuation of the AltspaceVR app. The company is, however, still developing its proprietary Mesh app that lets co-workers meet in a virtual space without a headset.

Source: Microsoft is nixing its Windows mixed reality platform

Clarified at last: The physics of popping champagne

It sounds like a simple, well-known everyday phenomenon: there is high in a champagne , the stopper is driven outwards by the compressed gas in the bottle and flies away with a powerful pop. But the physics behind this is complicated.

[…]

Using complex computer simulations, it was possible to recalculate the behavior of the stopper and the .

In the process, astonishing phenomena were discovered: a supersonic shock wave is formed and the gas flow can reach more than one and a half times the speed of sound. The results, which appear on the pre-print server arXiv,

[…]

“The champagne cork itself flies away at a comparatively low speed, reaching perhaps 20 meters per second,”

[…]

“However, the gas that flows out of the bottle is much faster,” says Wagner. “It overtakes the cork, flows past it and reaches speeds of up to 400 meters per second.”

That is faster than the speed of sound. The gas jet therefore breaks the shortly after the bottle is opened—and this is accompanied by a shock wave.

[…]

“Then there are jumps in these variables, so-called discontinuities,” says Bernhard Scheichl (TU Vienna & AC2T), Lukas Wagner’s dissertation supervisor. “Then the pressure or velocity in front of the shock wave have a completely different value than just behind it.”

This point in the gas jet, where the pressure changes abruptly, is also known as the “Mach disk.” “Very similar phenomena are also known from or rockets, where the exhaust jet exits the engines at high speed,”

[…]

The Mach disk first forms between the bottle and the cork and then moves back towards the bottle opening.

Temporarily colder than the North Pole

Not only the gas pressure, but also the temperature changes abruptly: “When gas expands, it becomes cooler, as we know from spray cans,” explains Lukas Wagner. This effect is very pronounced in the champagne bottle: the gas can cool down to -130°C at certain points. It can even happen that tiny dry ice crystals are formed from the CO2 that makes the sparkling wine bubble.

“This effect depends on the original temperature of the sparkling wine,” says Lukas Wagner. “Different temperatures lead to dry ice crystals of different sizes, which then scatter light in different ways. This results in variously colored smoke. In principle, you can measure the temperature of the sparkling wine by just looking at the color of the smoke.”

[…]

The audible pop when the bottle is opened is a combination of different effects: Firstly, the cork expands abruptly as soon as it has left the bottle, creating a pressure wave, and secondly, you can hear the shock wave, generated by the supersonic gas jet—very similar to the well-known aeroacoustic phenomenon of the sonic boom.

[…]

More information: Lukas Wagner et al, Simulating the opening of a champagne bottle, arXiv (2023). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2312.12271

Source: Clarified at last: The physics of popping champagne

Nuclear fusion net gain experiment replicated three times.

Last year on a December morning, scientists at the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California (LLNL) managed, in a world first, to produce a nuclear fusion reaction that released more energy than it used, in a process called “ignition.”

Now they say they have successfully replicated ignition at least three times this year, according to a December report from the LLNL. This marks another significant step in what could one day be an important solution to the global climate crisis, driven primarily by the burning of fossil fuels.

NIF's target chamber is where the magic happens -- temperatures of 100 million degrees and pressures extreme enough to compress the target to densities up to 100 times the density of lead are created there.

Source: Nuclear fusion: With 200 lasers and a peppercorn-sized fuel capsule, scientists inch closer to mastering this energy | CNN

AI Act: French govt accused of being influenced by lobbyist with conflict of interests by senators in the pockets of copyright giants. Which surprises no-one watching the AI act process.

French senators criticised the government’s stance in the AI Act negotiations, particularly a lack of copyright protection and the influence of a lobbyist with alleged conflicts of interests, former digital state secretary Cédric O.

The EU AI Act is set to become the world’s first regulation of artificial intelligence. Since the emergence of AI models, such as GPT-4, used by the AI system ChatGPT, EU policymakers have been working on regulating these powerful “foundation” models.

“We know that Cédric O and Mistral influenced the French government’s position regarding the AI regulation bill of the European Commission, attempting to weaken it”, said Catherine Morin-Desailly, a centrist senator at the during the government’s question time on Wednesday (20 December).

“The press reported on the spectacular enrichment of the former digital minister, Cédric O. He entered the company Mistral, where the interests of American companies and investment funds are prominently represented. This financial operation is causing shock within the Intergovernmental Committee on AI you have established, Madam Prime Minister,” she continued.

The accusations were vehemently denied by the incumbent Digital Minister Jean-Noël Barrot: “It is the High Authority for Transparency in Public Life that ensures the absence of conflicts of interest among former government members.”

Moreover, Barrot denied the allegations that France has been the spokesperson of private interests, arguing that the government: “listened to all stakeholders as it is customary and relied solely on the general interest as our guiding principle.”

[…]

Barrot was criticised in a Senate hearing earlier the same day by Pascal Rogard, director of  the Society of Dramatic Authors and Composers, who said that “for the first time, France, through the medium of Jean-Noël Barrot […] has neither supported culture, the creation industry, or copyrights.”

Morin-Desailly then said that she questioned the French stance on AI, which, in her view, is aligned with the position of US big tech companies.

Drawing a parallel from the position of big tech on this copyright AI debate and the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, Rogard said that since it was enforced he did not “observed any damage to the [big tech]’s business activities.”

[…]

“Trouble was stirred by the renowned Cédric O, who sits on the AI Intergovernmental Committee and still wields a lot of influence, notably with the President of the Republic”, stated Morin-Desailly earlier the same day at the Senate hearing with Rogard. Other sitting Senators joined Morin-Desailly in criticising the French position, and O.

Looking at O’s influential position in the government, the High Authority for Transparency in Public Life decided to forbid O for a three-year time-span to lobby the government or own shares within companies of the tech sector.

Yet, according to Capital, O bought shares through his consulting agency in Mistral AI. Capital revealed O invested €176.1, which is now valued at €23 million, thanks to the company’s last investment round in December.

Moreover, since September, O has at the Committee on generative artificial intelligence to advise the government on its position towards AI.

[…]

 

Source: AI Act: French government accused of being influenced by lobbyist with conflict of interests