British soldier awarded the Military Cross for fighting off 150 Taliban – Times Online

Fusilier Damien Hields used his grenade machinegun to destroy seven Taliban positions before his ambushers realised he was their main threat. After peppering his vehicle with bullets, they hit the 24-year-old soldier. He had to be dragged off for treatment by his driver after he tried to continue fighting.

“Fusilier Hields showed extraordinary courage under intense fire,” said Lieutenant-Colonel Huw James, his commanding officer. “I was astonished at the state of his vehicle. There were so many holes in it, it was like a teabag. The Taliban did everything in their power to neutralise [him] and Fusilier Hields was having none of it. His actions allowed his patrol to come out of the ambush in which they were outnumbered by three or four to one and probably saved a lot of lives.”

British soldier awarded the Military Cross for fighting off 150 Taliban – Times Online

European Battle Groups Evaluated

The EU has had it’s own battlegroups since 2003. These are battalion sized (500/600 people) ground forces allowing the EU to project it’s power without outside help and reinforce its position as an international actor.
Allthough this is a great step forward for EU independent operations, the battlegroups are far from perfect.
This report was released which goes into the pros and cons of the current EU battlegroup structure – as well as explaining it – in detail. PDF link.

Army tests James Bond style tank that is ‘invisible’ | the Daily Mail

I’ve covered a few of these pages before, but this one comes from the Daily Mail.

In principle, stealth cloaks are possible by using a camera on one side and a projector on the other. This story says it’s been done and demonstrated on a tank, and that they’re expecting to be able to do it without camera’s and projectors.

More invisible stuff around here

Joint Qualification for US Officers

The US is tackling the problem of jointness the right way. Jointness is used to describe operations in conjunction with another (or mulitple other) military arm(s) (such as Air Force coordinating with the Marines).
The US has set up a Joint Qualification System which offers points depending on joint actions each officer has had in the past, but can also gain by attending joint courses and excersises. Enough points result in a Joint Speciality Officer (JSO) designation.
From 2008 officers may not reach flag rank without a JSO.
In a way it’s crazy that interservice rivalry has been allowed to flourish so long and that armed forces have fought as such seperate units. Nowadays with communications being at the point they are there is no excuse for non-jointness in the armed forces.

UK MOD Whitepaper on Nuclear Deterrent

The UK MOD and Foreign Affairs has published it’s stance on Nuclear deterrent. Interestingly it shows that allthough the UK is the NPT signatory with the smallest arsenal, it’s ordanance is still considerable at 160 warheads and delivery systems. It has decreased in size by 50% since the Cold War and decreased effectiveness by 75%. The UK is the only NPT signatory to have reduced itself to a single delivery system (namely the submarine), forgoing land based silo’s, ship based launchers and air launched weapons.
The paper explores why the UK needs a nuclear deterrent, presents rebuttals to commonly voiced objections and the history of the UK nuclear deterrent rationale.
The option reccommended is to stick with submarines, but as the current Vanguard class is reaching the end of it’s service life in 2020 and is looking unscaleable, the proposed solution is to replace the class with an entirely new class of conventionally powered submarine.
The UK wants one submarine continuously on patrol. In a fleet of submarines, at least one is always in the shipyard for a period of three / four years for refit and repairs. This means the UK requires a fleet of three or four submarines to be able to maintain a continuous patrol of one.
Astoundingly, this tiny fleet will be the entirety of the UK nuclear deterrent.
(warning: PDF link)

Pentagon FY 2008 Budget

The Pentagon has released it’s budget (yet again, stunningly huge!) on internet.

This link goes to the full summary of tables – for those who are interested in all the numbers for all the different elements that go into an armed forces.

There are some interesting thins in there, such as Iraq Freedom Fund, Defense for $50,000m and the $1,700,000m for the Iraq Security Forces Fund (with a similar amount going to Afghanistan). They are expecting to spend $165,343,662m on operations and maintenance and $101,678,734m on procurement. Huge numbers.

The rest of the gunk and pr stuff can be found here.

UK building Tri-service defence acadamy

The UK are going to consolidate in St. Athan, Wales, and consolidating a wide variety of trainings from 27 different locations in to 1. Not only will that be a whole lot cheaper in terms of manpower required to run the academy and property expenses, but it will also mean that inter-services jointness could become a core cultural value in a large part of defence, which means a whole load more efficiency due to less unhealthy interservice rivalry and more understanding of the other branches.

USAF Special Projects

Aviation Now has an interesting article on the USAF special projects, such as followups to the F-117A in the form of stealth cruise missles that also do recce.
Particularly interesting is the range of hacking projects the USAF has, such as Suter, which in the first guise can ‘see’ what targetted radars are seeing, and has grown to hack into the enemy computer networks and take control of them to manipulate the sensors. The latest version can

invade the links to time-critical targets, such as battlefield ballistic missile launchers or mobile surface-to-air missile launchers

.

CVN-21 Supercarrier

The US is going from biggest to even bigger and commissioning a new class of aircraft carrier, the CVN-21. This will displace around 102,000 tons – compared to the British Invincible (22,000t) and the future French carrier (75,000t), this is indeed massive.
The current US aircraft carriers are built around a basic design developed 50 years ago, and allthough there are to be no radical departures in hull design (unlike the new British designs which are a radical departure featuring trimaran hulls and hexagonal flight decks), the CVN-21 will feature quite a few innovations, such as an electromagnetic launch rail, allowing for much more free space and electricity, a repositioned island and plug and play electronics, as well as better armour around the munitions bays and a better protected and more modern command centre.
The plan is to have the first one off the line in 2014.
This site has a comprehensive run down of the new features and is kept updated.